Our anna does ‘science’.

Today we would like to look at our anna’s attempt to support her anti-vaccination views with ‘science’. (Apologies for the length of the post.)

Well, anna science anyway. This is our anna’s post on the anti-vaccination facebook group Australian Vaccination Network (now called Fans of the AVN). A group run by Meryl Dorey. The same Meryl Dorey who called doctors and nurses RAPISTS for administering vaccines.

We are not joking, here are two examples of this abhorrent claim.

TW: AVN claims vaccination is rape and doctors are rapists…again

Our anna decided to post her expert opinion to the group. It is worth noting that after 4 months the post has 4 likes, and no comments. Here is our anna’s ‘science’:

Unfortunately commercial interests are driving current government policy on Forced Vaccinations.

Malcolm Turnbulls wife Lucy owns shares in a pharmaceutical company that directly profited from the Federal Government No Jab, No Pay policy through an agreement with Glaxo- Smith Klein Pharmaceuticals.

There is a significant amount of information that is supressed by the major pharmaceutical companies and the Government in relation to injuries caused by the current vaccination schedule.

This can no longer be ignored, and a Royal Commission with broad scope and transparency needs to be undertaken to give legitimacy to either side of the agenda.

It appears true that there could be between 1:1000 or less injuries to children as a result of the Immunization schedule.

The real question is, if you have 1000 cupcakes, and 1 is poisoned, would it be acceptable to allow 999 children to eat the cupcakes without issue knowing that 1 could be injured or killed as the result?

The fact is that people need to be told the truth.

No company has a right to risk the life of a child. The only acceptable risk, is Zero risk .

There is no such thing as “Acceptable Losses” when it comes to our children.

The fact is that unless there is full transparency, there can be no Mandatory Vaccinations forced by the government.

 

The first thing to point out, that a ‘science’ post coming from an ex-science teacher with ‘multiple degrees’ it appears to lack that one little thing that science is based on. It is called evidence.

Our anna does not cite one single source for anything that she claims. We are sorry, but our anna’s arse is not a reliable source for anything claimed in this post.

Let’s look at the crap our anna has put forward as true.

  •  Unfortunately commercial interests are driving current government policy on Forced Vaccinations. Malcolm Turnbulls wife Lucy owns shares in a pharmaceutical company that directly profited from the Federal Government No Jab, No Pay policy through an agreement with Glaxo- Smith Klein Pharmaceuticals. – Our anna’s anti-government views are well known, but where is the evidence that Lucy’s stock portfolio is directly influencing Government Policy?

 

  • Unfortunately commercial interests are driving current government policy on Forced Vaccinations. – Let’s make it clear, there is no such thing as forced, or mandatory vaccinations in the childhood vaccine schedule. There are some occupations where up to date vaccinations are a requirement, but not the childhood vaccination schedule. If, as a parent you choose not to vaccinate your children you can do that. The consequence is that you are no longer eligible for Government Rebates.

 

  • There is a significant amount of information that is supressed by the major pharmaceutical companies and the Government in relation to injuries caused by the current vaccination schedule.This can no longer be ignored, and a Royal Commission with broad scope and transparency needs to be undertaken to give legitimacy to either side of the agenda. – Our anna’s anti-government views are well known, but again where is the supporting evidence for our anna’s claim? Might we just remind users of the definition of the term defamation (Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.)

 

  • It appears true that there could be between 1:1000 or less injuries to children as a result of the Immunization schedule. – Again, where does our anna get her information to reduce the current known Adverse Reaction rate of 1:100,000 to 1:1,000? The use of the Americanised spelling of Immunisation would indicate that our anna has plagiarised an American anti-vaccinationist.

 

  • The real question is, if you have 1000 cupcakes, and 1 is poisoned, would it be acceptable to allow 999 children to eat the cupcakes without issue knowing that 1 could be injured or killed as the result? – This is another example of our anna’s gross incompetence.  Our anna pulls a number out of her arse, then suddenly 1 in a thousand children are poisoned. No anna, you can’t make up your own facts. That is not science, that is bullshit masquerading as a teacher. Before the introduction of vaccines one in ten children dies before the age of one. Today that figure has dropped to one in two hundred. That is a 95% reduction in deaths of children under one.

 

  • The fact is that people need to be told the truth. – Yes anna, we wish you would tell us the truth.

 

  • No company has a right to risk the life of a child. – True. Which is why all vaccines are put through exhaustive testing before they are allowed to be used in Australia. The average vaccine takes 10 years to get TGA approval. How much testing was put into bleach enemas, coffee enemas, colloidal silver, Dimethyl sulfoxide, or any of the many other “cures” peddled by the anti-vaccination community to either replace vaccines, or ‘detox’ children who have been vaccinated?

 

  • The only acceptable risk, is Zero risk . – Yep, probably the only thing our anna has said that is correct. Before the introduction of vaccines children died. They died of diseases that due to vaccines we rarely ever see.

 

  • There is no such thing as “Acceptable Losses” when it comes to our children. – Every child deserves to live. Know how many children have died from a vaccine in Australia in the last 20 years? None.

 

  • The fact is that unless there is full transparency, there can be no Mandatory Vaccinations forced by the government. – See above comment about forced and/or mandatory vaccines.

If you want actual information about the childhood vaccination schedule, speak to a real  doctor, or you can look at the Department of Health Immunise Website, before speaking to a real medical professional.

The majority of the information we have provided can be found here – http://immunise.health.gov.au/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s