The law, why does it hate anna so?

Seems that our anna can get her nose out of joint when she doesn’t get her own way.

Another rant on facebook about her ex-partner Anil going to court to try and get access to his children. It’s a pity that our anna seems to have forgotten it takes two to make a child. The rant in full:

Family Court – your ex-partner can take you to Court simply because they do not want to communicate with you and want a Judge to decide. They refuse to do mediation. If I do not attend court and play along with these games a warrent for my ARREST will be issued…And costs may be awarded against me. Brilliant, the Father does not have to pay child support or spousal maintenance or any of the debts left, but can get me to pay his costs for vexatious litigation. Doesn’t matter that the ex partner has had previous and current Domestic violence orders against him and continues to get people to threaten and harrass me and the Children after 2 years. Doesn’t matter that the ex-partner can pick and choose when he wants to be in the Children’s life and when he doesn’t. Non of this puts the best interests of the Children at heart. What a world.

Wow, what a ramble. Our anna was in full flight that day. let’s have a lazy look at the ramble to see how selfish and self centred that our anna is when it comes to the children that our anna and her ex-partner share.

Family Court – your ex-partner can take you to Court simply because they do not want to communicate with you and want a Judge to decide.  Well, actually, if our anna knew anything of the law she would know that is exactly why the Family Court is there. If the parents of children cannot come to agreement the court can decide what is in the best interests of the children. The issue here is that we have all dealt with anna. We know that communication is impossible if our anna is not getting her way.

They refuse to do mediation. Again, it is a right that everyone has, but it is looked upon poorly by the courts if you don’t.

If I do not attend court and play along with these games a warrant for my ARREST will be issued…And costs may be awarded against me.  An arrest warrant MAY be issued if a person does not attend court, regardless of who it is. The issue we have is that anna believes that the well being of her children is a game. The well being of their children should be the number one priority, not stalking and harassing people on the internet.

Brilliant, the Father does not have to pay child support or spousal maintenance or any of the debts left, but can get me to pay his costs for vexatious litigation.  Another example of the mentality of our anna. Life, well anna’s life, is about money, nothing more. If the parents of a child cannot come to an agreement then Child Support is dealt with by the Child Support Agency (CSA), not by the Family Court. And Spousal Maintenance and joint debts would be dealt with as part of their divorce settlement. Pity that they were never married. And vexatious litigation? See our comment below.

Doesn’t matter that the ex partner has had previous and current Domestic violence orders against him and continues to get people to threaten and harrass me and the Children after 2 years. We would be interested to know if our anna meant Domestic Violence Orders (DVO), or INTERIM Domestic Violence Orders. It is an unfortunate fact of life that many solicitors use DVO applications as a form of abuse during child custody and divorce proceedings in the Family Court. Our anna had her day in court. On September 15 2016 anna’s accusations of domestic violence were found to be unsubstantiated. So until September 15 2016 Anil Patel would have been under an INTERIM Domestic Violence Order. An order that can and is obtained without any need to provide evidence or proof.

Doesn’t matter that the ex-partner can pick and choose when he wants to be in the Children’s life and when he doesn’t. Non of this puts the best interests of the Children at heart. What a world.  Again, we only have our anna’s word for what actually happened. But a person under the constraint of an INTERIM Domestic Violence Order is quite restricted as to how they can act, move or respond. Interestingly our anna finally mentions the best interests of the children. Not her children. Not their children. THE children. As if they were a possession. We might make note that the ICS that she insisted upon doesn’t agree with our anna’s stance. Makes us wonder exactly where the issues with this current court action actually lay.

UPDATE:

We have received information that advised us that Anil Patel does pay child support, and was paying child support when our anna posted this claim. We are quite happy to allow our anna the right of reply. All our anna needs to do is present her correspondence from the Child Support Agency covering the time period that includes 18th May 2016.

Not too hard to do, produce evidence to support a claim made. It is the way most scientists work.

 

Advertisements

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s